Romney trying to create illusion of momentum.
Jonathan Chait has a real good piece up right now. In it, he argues that Mitt Romney’s trying to push a “momentum” narrative “in the hopes of winning positive media coverage and, thus, creating a self-fulfilling prophecy.” His evidence is pretty damned good:
Over the last week, Romney’s campaign has orchestrated a series of high-profile gambits in order to feed its momentum narrative. Last week, for instance, Romney’s campaign blared out the news that it was pulling resources out of North Carolina. The battleground was shifting! Romney on the offensive! On closer inspection, it turned out that Romney was shifting exactly one staffer. It is true that Romney leads in North Carolina, and it is probably his most favorable battleground state. But the decision to have a staffer move out of state, with a marching band and sound trucks in tow to spread the news far and wide, signals a deliberate strategy to create a narrative.
Also last week, Paul Ryan held a rally in Pittsburgh. Romney moving in to Pennsylvania! On the offensive! Skeptical reporters noted that Ryan’s rally would bleed into the media coverage in southeast Ohio and that Romney was not devoting any real money to Pennsylvania. Romney’s campaign keeps leaking that it is planning to spend money there. (Today’s leak: “Republicans are genuinely intrigued by the prospect of a strike in Pennsylvania and, POLITICO has learned, are considering going up on TV there outside the expensive Philadelphia market.” Note the noncommittal terms: intrigued and considering.) The story also floats Romney’s belief that, since Pennsylvania has no early voting, it can postpone its planned, any-day-now move into Pennsylvania until the end. This allows Romney to keep the Pennsylvania bluff going until, what, a couple of days before the election?
This actually plaays well to something I wrote yesterday — that is, that the media is desperate find some action at a time when polling seems to have leveled off. They’ll eat this up — even knowing it’s all bullshit — because they’re afraid that if they don’t tell you something about the race, you’ll change over to The Weather Channel. Unfortunately, there’s nothing to tell and it’s not likely there will be for at least two days, so “Mittmentum” is as good a pile of BS as any.
Chait says “[T]he widespread perception that Romney is pulling ahead is Romney’s campaign suckering the press corps with a confidence game.” But I don’t think the press are suckers or, at least, if they are it’s because they want to be.
Source: New York Magazine
76 Notes/ Hide
-
nohetero likes this
-
powertothehavenots likes this
-
onionhighonionandrenown reblogged this from reagan-was-a-horrible-president
-
viciousneutral likes this
-
onionhighonionandrenown likes this
-
risquemarionette reblogged this from sleepyblacksheep
-
sleepyblacksheep reblogged this from reagan-was-a-horrible-president
-
sleepyblacksheep likes this
-
junk-the-eater likes this
-
thenormismonstrous likes this
-
newsandtrade likes this
-
joost5 likes this
-
wristwatchesareneat likes this
-
ennui-the-viii reblogged this from reagan-was-a-horrible-president
-
andreagoldston reblogged this from reagan-was-a-horrible-president
-
pop-rocks-blowjob likes this
-
friggen-scrota likes this
-
kmr-13 likes this
-
holly-sunflower reblogged this from reagan-was-a-horrible-president
-
dendroica likes this
-
abagond likes this
-
cicerosaidwhatnow reblogged this from secular-paladin
-
soiledphotos likes this
-
metwosix reblogged this from reagan-was-a-horrible-president
-
silas216 reblogged this from quickhits
-
silas216 likes this
-
perfectonpurpose likes this
-
atea-y-feminista reblogged this from reagan-was-a-horrible-president
-
poetryismyweapon likes this
-
thesmithian likes this
-
chipmunksback reblogged this from reagan-was-a-horrible-president
-
cabradine likes this
-
notalexus likes this
-
swingsingplay likes this
-
secular-paladin reblogged this from reagan-was-a-horrible-president and added:
What a lying, two-faced, shitstain of a putz.
-
iwantcupcakes likes this
-
gooeybelle likes this
-
electricpub likes this
-
reagan-was-a-horrible-president reblogged this from truth-has-a-liberal-bias
-
har-megiddo reblogged this from truth-has-a-liberal-bias
-
reagan-was-a-horrible-president likes this
-
po-op reblogged this from truth-has-a-liberal-bias
-
french-ass-name reblogged this from queputa
-
queputa reblogged this from truth-has-a-liberal-bias
-
thepandabaker reblogged this from truth-has-a-liberal-bias
-
pandasonparade likes this
-
slightlyoverlyopinionated reblogged this from truth-has-a-liberal-bias
-
letinout likes this
- Show more notes

![Romney trying to create illusion of momentum.
Jonathan Chait has a real good piece up right now. In it, he argues that Mitt Romney’s trying to push a “momentum” narrative “in the hopes of winning positive media coverage and, thus, creating a self-fulfilling prophecy.” His evidence is pretty damned good:
Over the last week, Romney’s campaign has orchestrated a series of high-profile gambits in order to feed its momentum narrative. Last week, for instance, Romney’s campaign blared out the news that it was pulling resources out of North Carolina. The battleground was shifting! Romney on the offensive! On closer inspection, it turned out that Romney was shifting exactly one staffer. It is true that Romney leads in North Carolina, and it is probably his most favorable battleground state. But the decision to have a staffer move out of state, with a marching band and sound trucks in tow to spread the news far and wide, signals a deliberate strategy to create a narrative.
Also last week, Paul Ryan held a rally in Pittsburgh. Romney moving in to Pennsylvania! On the offensive! Skeptical reporters noted that Ryan’s rally would bleed into the media coverage in southeast Ohio and that Romney was not devoting any real money to Pennsylvania. Romney’s campaign keeps leaking that it is planning to spend money there. (Today’s leak: “Republicans are genuinely intrigued by the prospect of a strike in Pennsylvania and, POLITICO has learned, are considering going up on TV there outside the expensive Philadelphia market.” Note the noncommittal terms: intrigued and considering.) The story also floats Romney’s belief that, since Pennsylvania has no early voting, it can postpone its planned, any-day-now move into Pennsylvania until the end. This allows Romney to keep the Pennsylvania bluff going until, what, a couple of days before the election?
This actually plaays well to something I wrote yesterday — that is, that the media is desperate find some action at a time when polling seems to have leveled off. They’ll eat this up — even knowing it’s all bullshit — because they’re afraid that if they don’t tell you something about the race, you’ll change over to The Weather Channel. Unfortunately, there’s nothing to tell and it’s not likely there will be for at least two days, so “Mittmentum” is as good a pile of BS as any.
Chait says “[T]he widespread perception that Romney is pulling ahead is Romney’s campaign suckering the press corps with a confidence game.” But I don’t think the press are suckers or, at least, if they are it’s because they want to be.](http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_mcd20ibd0U1qfengno1_1280.jpg)