Logo

Quick Hits Headlines

  • Archive
  • RSS
  • Ask me anything
Walmart’s Phony Low Prices.

It’s pretty clear by now that Republican economic policies can be boiled down to “penny wise, but pound foolish.” The idea is that it’s possible to save your way to prosperity. This ignores simple math: if you don’t make enough to be wealthy, no amount of saving will make you wealthy. It’s a question of incomes, not savings. Rich people are rich because they make a lot of money. And you make a lot of money by spending wisely.
Of course, Republican economic policies make no sense because they’re rationalizations for the transfer of wealth from the bottom to the top. Some really do believe this math-challenged mumbo-jumbo — perhaps even most Republicans. But those few who understand don’t expect it to actually help everyone. It’s just a con to help those few at the top. Tell the chumps the wealth will trickle down and, if the question of when actually ever seeps into their sheepish brains, tell them it’ll happen any minute now, just you wait. Because Reagan.
But what’s the penny wise and pound foolish thinking look like in the wild? Pretty the opposite of this:Mother Jones:
Chances are you missed this particular bargain on Black Friday: Agree to spend 15 cents more on every shopping trip, and Walmart, Target, and other large retailers will agree to pay their workers at least $25,000 a year. 
Big box retailers aren’t actually offering that deal, but a new study by the liberal think tank Demos argues that it would be a great bargain for us all if they did. Increasing the average wage at large retailers  from $21,000 to $25,000 would probably cost you less than $20 a year at  the register yet lift some 1.5 million people out of poverty (including  your cashier), create 100,000 new jobs, and boost GDP by some $13.5  billion.
Demos argues that retailers would benefit, despite higher labor  costs, because their low-wage employees could suddenly afford to buy  more of the basic necessities that they scan and load into plastic bags  every day.
If you’re like me, this is the part where you release a loud and resounding, “Duh!”
This is Henry Ford’s argument — that the worker ought to make enough to afford the product — and that argument made Ford a rich man. If you can convince your workers to give you some of your money back (and make a tidy profit in the process), why wouldn’t you?
Because you’re penny wise and pound foolish. There are maybe five people on Earth who would argue that Walmart’s success is because of their commitment to quality. Walmart makes money by saving money — except they don’t. Not really, anyway.
The problem with Walmart’s business model is that it’s a welfare queen business model. Their low prices are propped up by low wages, which in turn are subsidized by government largesse.Daily Kos:
Wal-Mart’s poverty wages force employees to rely on $2.66 billion in government help every year, or about $420,000 per store. In state after state, Wal-Mart employees are the top recipients of Medicaid. As many as 80 percent of workers in Wal-Mart stores use food stamps.
And that government money? That comes out of your pocket. Walmart’s low prices are a con. It’s not any cheaper than any place else — they just do a better job of hiding and shifting the costs. You’ve heard of “creative accounting?” This is creative commerce; the cost on the price tag isn’t actually what you’re paying. Worse, if you don’t shop at Walmart, you’re still paying for their stuff. They’ve found a way to suck money out of your wallet without even selling you anything.
And Walmart’s not going to be very interested in changing. Their wage slavery is making them a tidy profit. It may be a welfare queen business model, but it’s a successful model. The company makes $15 billion a year. Off food stamps and Medicaid.
From a legal standpoint, you can’t blame Walmart — this is all completely above board. From a moral standpoint, they don’t get off so easy. But there is no way in the world that you can argue that Walmart’s government-subsidized prices represent any close to free market economics.
And it also represents the failure of trickle-down economics. Walmart is fabulously successful, yet the workers get paid crap. And they’ll always get paid crap. It’s a dead-end job.
If we force Walmart to change, expect Republicans to scream bloody murder. Penny wise, pound foolish.
-Wisco
[image source]
Pop-upView Separately

Walmart’s Phony Low Prices.

It’s pretty clear by now that Republican economic policies can be boiled down to “penny wise, but pound foolish.” The idea is that it’s possible to save your way to prosperity. This ignores simple math: if you don’t make enough to be wealthy, no amount of saving will make you wealthy. It’s a question of incomes, not savings. Rich people are rich because they make a lot of money. And you make a lot of money by spending wisely.

Of course, Republican economic policies make no sense because they’re rationalizations for the transfer of wealth from the bottom to the top. Some really do believe this math-challenged mumbo-jumbo — perhaps even most Republicans. But those few who understand don’t expect it to actually help everyone. It’s just a con to help those few at the top. Tell the chumps the wealth will trickle down and, if the question of when actually ever seeps into their sheepish brains, tell them it’ll happen any minute now, just you wait. Because Reagan.

But what’s the penny wise and pound foolish thinking look like in the wild? Pretty the opposite of this:

Mother Jones:

Chances are you missed this particular bargain on Black Friday: Agree to spend 15 cents more on every shopping trip, and Walmart, Target, and other large retailers will agree to pay their workers at least $25,000 a year.

Big box retailers aren’t actually offering that deal, but a new study by the liberal think tank Demos argues that it would be a great bargain for us all if they did. Increasing the average wage at large retailers from $21,000 to $25,000 would probably cost you less than $20 a year at the register yet lift some 1.5 million people out of poverty (including your cashier), create 100,000 new jobs, and boost GDP by some $13.5 billion.

Demos argues that retailers would benefit, despite higher labor costs, because their low-wage employees could suddenly afford to buy more of the basic necessities that they scan and load into plastic bags every day.

If you’re like me, this is the part where you release a loud and resounding, “Duh!”

This is Henry Ford’s argument — that the worker ought to make enough to afford the product — and that argument made Ford a rich man. If you can convince your workers to give you some of your money back (and make a tidy profit in the process), why wouldn’t you?

Because you’re penny wise and pound foolish. There are maybe five people on Earth who would argue that Walmart’s success is because of their commitment to quality. Walmart makes money by saving money — except they don’t. Not really, anyway.

The problem with Walmart’s business model is that it’s a welfare queen business model. Their low prices are propped up by low wages, which in turn are subsidized by government largesse.

Daily Kos:

Wal-Mart’s poverty wages force employees to rely on $2.66 billion in government help every year, or about $420,000 per store. In state after state, Wal-Mart employees are the top recipients of Medicaid. As many as 80 percent of workers in Wal-Mart stores use food stamps.

And that government money? That comes out of your pocket. Walmart’s low prices are a con. It’s not any cheaper than any place else — they just do a better job of hiding and shifting the costs. You’ve heard of “creative accounting?” This is creative commerce; the cost on the price tag isn’t actually what you’re paying. Worse, if you don’t shop at Walmart, you’re still paying for their stuff. They’ve found a way to suck money out of your wallet without even selling you anything.

And Walmart’s not going to be very interested in changing. Their wage slavery is making them a tidy profit. It may be a welfare queen business model, but it’s a successful model. The company makes $15 billion a year. Off food stamps and Medicaid.

From a legal standpoint, you can’t blame Walmart — this is all completely above board. From a moral standpoint, they don’t get off so easy. But there is no way in the world that you can argue that Walmart’s government-subsidized prices represent any close to free market economics.

And it also represents the failure of trickle-down economics. Walmart is fabulously successful, yet the workers get paid crap. And they’ll always get paid crap. It’s a dead-end job.

If we force Walmart to change, expect Republicans to scream bloody murder. Penny wise, pound foolish.

-Wisco

[image source]

Source: griperblade.blogspot.com

    • #news
    • #politics
    • #labor
    • #consumers
    • #walmart
    • #crossposts
  • 6 months ago
  • 292
  • Comments
  • Permalink
  • Share
Print

292 Notes/ Hide

  1. arsnof reblogged this from the-bombardier
  2. strangelyindecisive reblogged this from fluffyshenanigans
  3. firestar14 likes this
  4. toomanyfandomsforoneurl likes this
  5. fluffyshenanigans reblogged this from the-bombardier
  6. the-bombardier reblogged this from kitsunenojutsu
  7. awalt2069 reblogged this from reagan-was-a-horrible-president
  8. furthest-city-light likes this
  9. kieru-kietai likes this
  10. magnetika reblogged this from masterofmonster
  11. thespammmm likes this
  12. wherehastherumgone likes this
  13. moodydk likes this
  14. jordan-the-humble reblogged this from truth-has-a-liberal-bias
  15. obsidiandragon reblogged this from kerrsplat
  16. lillisaurusrex likes this
  17. memoriumactivity reblogged this from letstauntskullgrin and added:
    I dislike the use of the word ‘sheep’, but otherwise this seems bang on.
  18. letstauntskullgrin reblogged this from suribot
  19. pensamiento-serpentino reblogged this from revengeofthesnatch
  20. krimzonite reblogged this from noirandchocolate
  21. all-the-little-foxes reblogged this from vongeek
  22. vongeek reblogged this from reagan-was-a-horrible-president
  23. theskypilot reblogged this from eyjayy
  24. noirandchocolate reblogged this from kyuubeymon
  25. leena301 likes this
  26. geromy-kun reblogged this from kyuubeymon
  27. chu-chan likes this
  28. jessysketches likes this
  29. kyuubeymon reblogged this from ranyakumo
  30. kerrsplat reblogged this from kalooeh
  31. rainbowcityinthebay likes this
  32. lucymiddletonrogers reblogged this from reagan-was-a-horrible-president
  33. lumberjacked reblogged this from irontongueofmidnight
  34. we-lifted-this-house likes this
  35. somnolentvigil reblogged this from masterofmonster
  36. kicklekackle likes this
  37. forthex likes this
  38. othartryggvassen likes this
  39. lytah likes this
  40. heirial reblogged this from ranyakumo
  41. thatasianninjagirl reblogged this from eyjayy
  42. vintango likes this
  43. somecomics likes this
  44. joninness reblogged this from palpitaod
  45. ixa-cise likes this
  46. srirachaeverything likes this
  47. josiahfiles likes this
  48. palpitaod reblogged this from meowbat
  49. palpitaod likes this
  50. child-of-the-rain reblogged this from meowbat
  51. Show more notesLoading...

Recent comments

Blog comments powered by Disqus
← Previous • Next →
An irritated Tumblr in Wisconsin
Home
Archives
RSS
Mobile
contact
    || Blogs: Griper Blade, Griper News || Diigo ||

Following

In Other News...

  • Photo via other-stuff

    youaintpunk:

    The riots also offered a glimpse into how photographs can be used out of context:

    ‘Sir: In last week’s article about the...

    Photo via other-stuff
  • Link via azspot
    I, WILLIAM BURROUGHS, CHALLENGE YOU, L. RON HUBBARD
    Link via azspot
  • Photo via reagan-was-a-horrible-president

    liberalsarecool:

    The general profile of gun owners in America differs substantially from the general public. Roughly three-quarters (74%) of...

    Photo via reagan-was-a-horrible-president
  • Video via arenaoftheunwell
    Video

    I’m watching Head again because of Mad Men.

    Video via arenaoftheunwell
See more →
  • RSS
  • Random
  • Archive
  • Ask me anything
  • Mobile

Effector Theme by Carlo Franco.

Powered by Tumblr